|
What
Does The Lord Require Of You? By
Kent Heaton The
essence of God’s law has always been the same. Whether examining the first
laws given man in The
summation of the law of God given in Deuteronomy presents the case for First,
“fear the Lord your God.” The people of Second,
“to walk in all his ways.” The path of man must be directed by the will of
the Lord. “O Lord, I know the way of man is not in himself; It is not in man
who walks to direct his own steps” (Jeremiah 10:23). The wise man said,
“Trust in the Lord with all your heart, and lean not on your own
understanding; In all your ways acknowledge Him, and He shall direct your paths.
Do not be wise in your own eyes; fear the Lord and depart from evil” (Proverbs
3:5-7). The Lord requires walking and that walking must be on the path he sets
forth. Third,
“to love Him.” Love is an active emotion that does not just respond with
only words or thoughts but with action. The demonstration of love is keeping the
commandments of the Lord (John 14:15). Love is demonstrated in our devotion to
the Lord in everything we do (Luke 10:27). We love him because He first loved us
(1 John 4:19). As we fear the Lord and walk in his paths we express our love by
obedience. Fourth,
“to serve the Lord your God with all your heart and with all your soul.”
Being a child of God is a life of servitude. We are servants of the most high
God. Our life is forfeit for Jesus Christ. This demands all we have to submit
ourselves (James 4:7). It demands all of our heart and all of our soul nothing
less will do. Finally,
“to keep the commandments of the Lord and His statutes which I commanded you
today for your good.” Often people have the idea that as long as they love the
Lord they do not have to follow any commands. Without keeping the commands and
statutes of the Lord there will be no blessing. This one sums up the other four.
& What
Does It Mean to Follow Jesus? It
is well that we should ponder the privileges of the Christian life, but we must
not forget that those privileges mean corresponding responsibilities; and it is
also well to remember that we cannot fulfill the responsibilities, only as we
enjoy by faith the privileges. To come to Christ, and to receive from Christ,
are our privileges; and to abide in Christ, and to follow after Him, are our
responsibilities. To
follow Christ, means at least three things; and these are—sacrifice,
suffering, and glory. 1
Sacrifice. In the case of the disciples it meant leaving their nets (Matthew iv.
19, 20): with Matthew, forsaking the "receipt of custom” (Matthew ix. 9);
and with the rich young ruler it was 14
sell all that thou hast, and distribute to the poor " (Luke 18: 22). To
follow Christ means at least two things, namely, the denial of self itself
(Matthew xvi. 24); and the putting Christ and His claims first (Luke ix. 57-62). Suffering.
Christ's distinct and definite command to Peter, as
He tells him that he will have to die for Him, is "Follow Me"
(John xxi. 19). Peter understood that to mean death (ii.
Peter i. 14). There is a "cross" for every follower of Christ (Mark
x. 21), and a death to the self-life, in order that we may bring
forth fruit unto God (John xii. 24-26). Jordan with its baptism, Gethsemane with
its bitter cup, Gabbatha with its fiendish mockery, Golgotha with its shame, the
Cross with its suffering, the darkness with its cry, and Calvary with its death,
have their counterpart in our experience. 3.
Glory. It is to His followers that Christ promises that they shall
"sit in the throne of His glory" (Matthew xix. 28); who shall be
with Him, and also be honored by the Father (John xii. 26). Christ not only
leads His followers to the Mount of Calvary to suffer with Him, but He also
leads them to the Mount of Transfiguration, that they may be glorified with Him.
To
follow Christ in holiness of life, in compassion of heart, in devotion of
service, in abandonment of will, in patience of spirit, in earnestness of soul,
and in loyalty to truth is evidence that we are His sheep (John 10:27). Surely
this is the least we can do, even as Bartimaeus (Mark 10:52), and the noble band
of women (Matt. 27:55). Of the former we read, “He followed Jesus in the
way,” and of the latter we read, “which followed Jesus into The
Irrationality of Defending Atheism, Deism and Relativism By
Bob Myhan One
cannot rationally defend atheism, deism and relativism because those who would
defend them have implicitly renounced the preconditions of intelligibility. The
atheist does this by denying the existence of the intelligent Creator. Assuming
humans would exist, at all, if they were not created, their thoughts would be
nothing more than the results of chemical reactions in the brain. Without
the intelligent, moral Creator that does exist, there could be neither right nor
wrong, either morally or intellectually. Therefore, people would not be
responsible for their thoughts or their actions. One could not help thinking
what he thinks or doing what he does, any more than a dog can help barking or a
cat meowing. The
deist renounces the preconditions of intelligibility by denying any supernatural
revelation from God to man. Since man is both logical and moral, his Creator is
also, of necessity, both logical and moral. But if the Creator never revealed
Himself to man and if the Creator never gave to
man laws of logic and behavior, man would not know how to reason
nor how he ought to behave. Thus, the fact that man does reason and that he does
hold others accountable for their actions is proof that God exists
and that He has revealed laws of logic and laws of behavior. Thus,
neither atheists nor deists can consistently defend their respective
philosophies. There can be no laws of logic or of human behavior without a
lawgiver, who is above man in His thoughts and ways. "For
My thoughts are not your thoughts, Nor are your ways My ways," says the
Lord. "For as the heavens are higher than the earth, So are My ways higher
than your ways, And My thoughts than your thoughts.” (Isaiah
55:8-9) As
for the relativist—it cannot be absolutely true that nothing is absolutely
true. For, even then, absolute relativism would be false.
&
|