Two Worldviews

By Bob Myhan

Anyone who thinks seriously about the world around him has a worldview, whether he realizes it or not. There are, basically, only two worldviews. Some view this world as the only reality they will ever know. They expect to live for a while, then die, ceasing to exist altogether. But there are others who view this world as only the first of two realities they will experience. They, too, expect to live for a while and die; but they do not expect to cease existing altogether. Rather, they expect to continue existing after death on a nonphysical plane. Why do these two groups have such different worldviews?

Each individual is born with no knowledge of the physical world. Everything he learns, “ex utero,” he learns via the five physical senses—sight, touch, taste, hearing and smell. More than likely, the first thing he discovers is light. And, very early in life, he discovers pain and suffering.

Once an individual begins to experience pain and suffering, it is natural to long for relief. And once he realizes that pain and suffering are the lot of mankind, he begins to long for an existence that is free of both.

No human being is born with an intuitive knowledge of the identity of his biological parents. It is impossible for an infant to know who gave birth to him, much less who fathered him. One learns the identity of his parents through testimony—theirs or someone else’s. The facts of life must be taught. This writer remembers hearing, for the first time, where babies come from.

It is also impossible to know, intuitively, the origin of mankind. Adam, for instance, could not have known that his body was “formed … of the dust of the ground” nor that “the breath of life” was “breathed into his nostrils” by the Creator. Eve could not have known she was made from the rib of a man. These things they could only learn by testimony from the Creator. Without such testimony, all they could conceivably know about the world around them is what they could learn from their physical senses, which could not possibly have informed them that they had been created (except, of course, by hearing the testimony of the Creator). In all of Adam’s 930 years, there would have been nothing he experienced from which he could have inferred, or deduced, his having been created. Again, he could only have known this by revelation from the Creator. Just as surely, no man living today can know that the first man and woman were created if it had not been revealed by God in the Bible.

The Bible tells us not only of the origin of mankind but also of his purpose and his destiny. Those who believe the Bible to be God’s word not only desire but expect an existence free of pain and suffering. They desire it because they hurt and they suffer in this world. They expect it because the same Bible that tells them of their origin and purpose in life tells them also of their destiny. &

 

Changes I Have Seen Since I've Been Preaching

By Forrest D. Moyer

I began preaching in 1946. Some forty-seven years have gone by since I began. I have seen many changes both in the world and in the church. Means of travel and communications have drastically changed. People have even gone to the moon. Governments have toppled; new nations have begun. Standards of living have improved for millions. And yet poverty reigns in many nations. Crime has become the norm in most of our cities. A car is stolen every 42 minutes in Fresno . People are killed as they stand on the street corners; drug and alcohol use have become common even among teenagers. Violence, nudity and profanity are standard fare on television and in movies. Homosexuality was one of the most disgraceful acts that one could think of when I was young. Now it is being heralded as being a normal lifestyle. Abortion was almost unheard of when I was a boy. Now millions of abortions are performed every year. We have an administration that endorses both homosexuality and abortion. Things have changed!

Changes in the Church

Not only have there been changes in the world, but we have seen many changes in the church of our Lord as well. Changes in such things as expedients might be most effective. Changes in God’s ordained worship, government, and work are always wrong. I have seen changes in both areas. With the coming of more efficient communications, we have been able to effectively teach more people. We have been able to sound forth the truth in radio and television as well as the printed page. I am happy to have been enabled to use such methods in gospel preaching.

I remember when I was young that tobacco use was quite common among members of the church. In fact, between Bible class and the assembly for worship, it was common to see dozens of men standing in the yard or on the steps smoking. We thought that anyone who said anything about such habits was a "fanatic" or "radical." Today most brethren have seen the danger in tobacco use. Here ... we see no one standing outside smoking.

When I was young, in every gospel meeting you would hear sermons on why we don’t use instrumental music or have choirs or groups singing in our worship. Today many churches are introducing choirs and groups. Some are even using instrumental music. Things have changed!

I have seen other changes that frighten me very much. When I began preaching, the Bible was accepted by all brethren to be the inspired word of God. Brethren everywhere demanded "book, chapter and verse" preaching. All preachers appealed to "command, example and necessary inference" as the way to establish Bible authority. The result was a united brotherhood. Today, it is different. Some brethren no longer regard the Bible as the truly inspired word of God. Even more have given up the demand for "book, chapter and verse" preaching and are calling for a "new hermeneutic" that rejects "command, example and necessary inference" as the way of determining God’s will for our lives. Max Lucado, a well known author and minister of the Oak Hills church of Christ in San Antonio , Texas , says: "I have a gut feeling that we (the church of Christ ) have approached the Bible as engineers, looking for a certain design or architectural code. And I think we find that everyone finds a different code ... There is no secret code. The Bible is a love letter as opposed to a blueprint. You don’t read a love letter the same way you read a blueprint" (quoted in Behold the Pattern, Goebel Music, p. 114). When brethren regard the Bible as a "love letter," they cease to "follow the pattern of sound words" (2 Tim. 1:13). Truly, things have changed.

When I began preaching, I never heard of such things as so-called "fellowship halls," "church kitchens," or "family centers with gymnasiums" among our brethren. When such things were first introduced, there was a hue and cry across the nation against such. Now such are commonplace among many brethren. Yes, things have changed.

If in our study of the word of God, we find that we are failing to do what God says or are doing what He does not say, then we need to change. But let us make sure that our changes are what God requires and not what we decide that would be pleasing to us.

Paul said to Timothy, "Hold fast the form of sound words, which thou hast heard of me, in faith and love which is in Christ Jesus" (2 Tim. 1:13). Jesus Himself said that "Heaven and earth shall pass away, but My word will never pass away." His message is an unchangeable message in the midst of a changing world. While we are involved in the changes of the modern world, it is gratifying to know that we can hold on to an unchanging God and to an unchanging message. Let us determine that we will never turn from the doctrine of Christ to any other message (2 John 9-10; Gal. 1:8-9). When the winds of change are blowing, we can latch on to the Rock of Ages and know that we are secure under the shelter of His wings. &

Editor’s note: The above was written 17 years ago but is as timely now as it was then.