A Broken and Contrite Heart

By Kent Heaton

The sacrifices of the Law of Moses were ordained by God as a sign of the covenant between Israel and the Lord (Psalm 50:5). Reading the Law unfolds a myriad of sacrifices that required the people to offer oxen, sheep, goats, grain, drink offerings, peace offerings and so forth. "Solomon offered a sacrifice of peace offerings, which he offered to the Lord, twenty-two thousand bulls and one hundred and twenty thousand sheep" (1 Kings 8:63). During the course of the Law governing the sacrifices including the sacrifices of Abraham and the faithful of the Lord, millions of animals were slaughtered.

In David's mournful Psalm of sorrow over sin the psalmist declares, "For You do not delight in sacrifice, otherwise I would give it; You are not pleased with burnt offering. The sacrifices of God area broken spirit; a broken and a contrite heart, 0 God, You will not despise (Psalms 51:16-17). Israel lost the message of God's true intent of sacrifices. It was not about the killing of animals but the destruction of a proud heart. In the midst of his sin with Bathsheba, David recognized that no amount of animal sacrifice could take away the guilt of his sin. He knew that what God required was a spirit broken with the grief of sin and a heart remorseful of the shame he brought to his heavenly Father.

Godly sorrow is the essence of repentance. "For the sorrow that is according to the will of God produces a repentance without regret, leading to salvation, but the sorrow of the world produces death"(2 Corinthians 7:10). When one comes before the throne of God in sorrow it can only be from a heart broken by the weight of sin. Isaiah declares, "For thus says the high and exalted One who lives forever, whose name is Holy, I dwell on a high and holy place, and also with the contrite and lowly of spirit in order to revive the spirit of the lowly and to revive the heart of the contrite (Isaiah 57:15).

Sorrow in repentance comes from a heart that has been crushed under the weight of bringing shame to the Heavenly Father, to His Son and to the Holy Spirit. "Therefore we also have as our ambition, whether at home or absent, to be pleasing to Him (2 Corinthians 5:9). The relationship with the Father is based upon an earnest desire to please Him in everything. When we fail to do that and we follow our own desires, the feelings of sorrow should overwhelm us with untold grief as we realize we have been displeasing to God.

Nathan came to David and told him God knew what he had done. When faced with the realization of his sin, David did not react in pride and arrogance defending his actions. "Then David said to Nathan, I have sinned against the LORD (2 Samuel 12:13). David's heart was broken and contrite. He experienced the grief of his sin within his own heart and when brought before God through the hand of Nathan, his grief increased dramatically. David was a man after God's own heart (Acts 13:22) because David understood that no number of animals could bring him closer to God without a heart that was broken down with guilt and overwhelmed with the knowledge of what sin had done.

Our view of sin must be based upon the understanding of its impact upon our lives. Repentance is the willingness to humble the heart in broken tones of deep remorse in the presence of God. "These, 0 God, You will not despise (Psalm 51:17). & (Via SEARCH, Volume 15, No. 12)

Sensory Perception & God

By Alexander Campbell

I believe all experiments yet made upon [deaf] persons have proved that faith, or the knowledge of God, and of a Creator, has come by hearing. By faith, Paul said, and not by reason, "we know that the worlds were made by the word of God." This case is extracted from "The Memoirs of the Academy of Science at Paris”--

“The son of a tradesman in Chartres, who had been deaf from his birth, and consequently [mute], when he was twenty-three or twenty-four years of age, began on a sudden to speak, without its being known that he had ever heard. This event drew the attention of every one, and many believed it to be miraculous. The young man, however, gave a plain and rational account, by which it appeared to proceed wholly from natural causes. He said that about four months before he was surprised by a NEW and pleasing sensation, which he afterward discovered to arise from the ringing bells; that as yet he heard with one ear, but afterward a kind of water came from his left ear, and then he could hear distinctly with both; and from this time he listened with the utmost curiosity and attention to the sounds which accompany those motions of the lips which he had before remarked to convey ideas or meaning from one person to another. In short, he was able to understand them, by noting the thing to which they related and the action they produced. And after repeated attempts to imitate them when alone, at the end of four months he thought himself able to talk. He, therefore, without having intimated what had happened, began at once to speak, and affected to join in conversation, though with much more imperfection than he was aware.

"Many divines immediately visited him, and questioned him concerning God, and the soul, moral good, and evil, and many other subjects of the same kind; but of all this they found him ignorant, though he had been used to go to mass, and had been instructed in all externals of devotion, as making the signs of the cross, looking upward, kneeling at proper seasons, and using gestures of penitence, and prayer. Of death itself, which may be considered as a sensible object, he had very confused, and imperfect ideas, nor did It appear that he had ever reflected upon it. His life was little more than animal, and sensitive. He seemed to be contented with the simple perception of such objects as he could perceive, and did not compare his ideas with each other nor draw inferences, as might have been expected from him. It appeared, however, that his understanding was vigorous, and his apprehensions quick, so that his intellectual defects must have been caused, not by the barrenness of the soil, but merely by the want of necessary cultivation." [Campbell-Owen Debate, page 154] &

Can the Creature Be Greater than the Creator?

By Bob Myhan

Some may say that this is a foolish question. And it would be if it were addressed to one who believes the Bible. But it is a question with which a deist must come to grips. Man is an intelligent being; therefore, his Creator must be more intelligent, by far. Else a non-intelligent being created an intelligent being or a lesser intelligent being created a being of greater intelligence.

Man is a loving being; therefore his Creator is a being of love. But how can the Creator be a loving being when He seemingly allows moral and physical evil to go unchecked? The deist cannot answer this question but the believer can; he believes there will be a day of reckoning, as the Bible teaches. &